Former President Donald Trump recently unveiled a controversial economic proposal on Truth Social, promising a nationwide dividend funded by tariffs on foreign imports. The plan promises at least $2,000 per person, excluding high-income earners, sparking debate across political and economic circles.

Trump framed the idea as a way for Americans to directly benefit from trade policies. Instead of relying on taxes or deficit spending, tariffs on imports would generate revenue, part of which would be redistributed to citizens as direct payments.

The strategy is straightforward: higher tariffs on foreign goods would increase government revenue and make domestic products more competitive. Once sufficient funds are collected, Americans would receive a $2,000 dividend, with high-income earners excluded to prioritize middle- and lower-income households.

Trump defended tariffs vigorously, claiming they strengthen the economy and dismissing critics as “fools.” He argued that the United States has become wealthier and more respected globally due to such policies, framing tariffs as a tool not just for trade but for public benefit.

Supporters see the plan as a novel form of wealth redistribution, allowing Americans to benefit from access to U.S. markets. Critics warn that tariffs could raise consumer prices, potentially offsetting the dividend’s value, though proponents argue that increased domestic production could stabilize costs.

The specifics of distribution remain unclear. Observers suggest options like direct payments, tax rebates, or targeted credits, while eligibility criteria beyond excluding high-income earners have not been defined. Implementation would require significant federal coordination and congressional approval.

Politically, the proposal aligns with Trump’s economic nationalism, appealing to voters skeptical of globalization. Economically, questions remain about the stability of tariff revenue, possible international retaliation, and long-term impacts on U.S. trade and growth.

Ultimately, Trump’s tariff-funded dividend is more a vision than a fully developed policy. While it has generated headlines, details about revenue, payment frequency, and administration remain undefined, highlighting ongoing debates over how economic policy can tangibly benefit ordinary Americans.